
How to Read a Frameless Servo Motor Torque-Speed Curve Before You Select a Motor
Learn how engineers should interpret continuous torque, peak torque, bus voltage, thermal limits, and duty cycle when reading torque-speed curves for frameless servo motors.
A torque-speed curve is one of the most important documents in a frameless servo motor selection process. It is also one of the easiest documents to misread.
Many projects begin with a simple requirement such as "we need 2 N·m" or "we need 3 N·m peak." That is not enough for a direct-drive system. A motor that can produce the required torque at stall may not sustain it at speed. A motor that looks strong in a peak table may overheat in continuous operation. A motor that works at 48 V may not have enough speed margin at 24 V.
We see this misunderstanding in roughly one out of every three first-time RFQs we receive. A customer sends a one-line requirement—"3 N·m, 48V"—and expects a single model recommendation. Without knowing the speed, duty cycle, thermal environment, and drive current limit, we cannot give a responsible answer. This guide explains exactly why, and how to read a torque-speed curve before selecting a frameless servo motor kit or torque motor.
Start with the operating point, not the maximum number
The first question is not "what is the highest torque?" The first question is:
What torque must the motor deliver at the required speed, for how long, under what thermal condition?
A useful motor request should include:
- Continuous torque at speed.
- Peak torque at speed.
- Peak duration.
- Duty cycle.
- Bus voltage.
- Ambient temperature or housing thermal condition.
- Current limit of the drive.
Without these values, the curve can be interpreted too optimistically.
A quick selection workflow
Before looking at a supplier curve, write down the motor duty in a simple table.
| Input | Example |
|---|---|
| Continuous operating point | 1.2 N·m at 800 RPM |
| Short peak point | 3.5 N·m at 500 RPM |
| Peak duration | 2 seconds |
| Repeat interval | Every 12 seconds |
| Bus voltage | 48 VDC |
| Controller current limit | 18 A peak, 7 A continuous |
| Ambient condition | 25 °C with aluminum housing contact |
| Housing limitation | Sealed joint, no forced airflow |
Then compare the curve against the table. If the required point falls inside the peak zone only, ask whether the peak duration and recovery time are acceptable. If the required point falls outside the continuous zone but is used repeatedly, request an RMS torque and thermal review.
A buyer should separate continuous operation, short peak duty, current limit, and voltage roll-off before choosing a motor.
The visual reading sequence is simple: locate the required operating point, check whether it sits in the continuous or peak region, then confirm whether the boundary is driven by heat, current, or voltage. If the point is close to a boundary, treat the selection as provisional until housing thermal behavior and drive current are confirmed.
Continuous torque vs peak torque
Continuous torque is the torque the motor can sustain without exceeding the defined thermal limit under the stated test condition. For frameless motors, this condition is especially important because the motor does not have its own housing and fan. The customer's housing is usually the heat sink.
Peak torque is short-duration torque. It may be available for acceleration, deceleration, emergency response, or transient load changes. But peak torque is not a continuous operating point.
| Curve region | How to use it |
|---|---|
| Continuous zone | Use for normal operating load and repeat-duty validation. |
| Peak zone | Use for short-duration events with defined time and cooling assumptions. |
| Current-limit boundary | Check whether the drive can actually deliver required phase current. |
| Voltage-limit boundary | Check whether speed target is realistic at the selected bus voltage. |
If a supplier only provides peak torque without continuous torque and test context, the buyer does not yet have enough information for engineering selection.
RMS torque: the bridge between motion profile and heat
For repeated motion, RMS torque is often more useful than peak torque alone. It estimates the heating effect of a changing torque profile.
A simplified RMS torque calculation is:
T_rms = sqrt((T1^2 x t1 + T2^2 x t2 + ... + Tn^2 x tn) / total cycle time)Example duty cycle:
| Segment | Torque | Duration |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration | 3.0 N·m | 0.5 s |
| Move | 1.2 N·m | 2.0 s |
| Hold | 0.8 N·m | 5.0 s |
| Deceleration | 2.5 N·m | 0.5 s |
| Rest | 0.1 N·m | 2.0 s |
The simplified RMS torque is:
T_rms = sqrt((3.0^2 x 0.5 + 1.2^2 x 2.0 + 0.8^2 x 5.0 + 2.5^2 x 0.5 + 0.1^2 x 2.0) / 10)
T_rms = sqrt((4.50 + 2.88 + 3.20 + 3.13 + 0.02) / 10)
T_rms = 1.17 N·mIf the curve shows a continuous torque capability above 1.17 N·m under a similar thermal condition, the motor may be a reasonable starting point. If the continuous limit is below this value, the motor may still work only with stronger heat sinking, lower duty, lower ambient temperature, or a larger motor.
This is still a simplified screen. Final validation should include real housing thermal behavior and drive settings.
The following visualization shows the duty-cycle profile from the example above. The colored bars represent real torque demand over one cycle, and the dashed red line is the resulting RMS torque:
The colored segments show the actual torque demand over one cycle. The dashed red line shows the resulting RMS torque (1.17 N·m). If this line sits above the motor's continuous rating, the motor will overheat.
Notice that even though the peak torque is 3.0 N\u00b7m (well into the peak zone), the RMS result of 1.17 N\u00b7m sits comfortably below the motor's continuous rating of 1.5 N\u00b7m. This means the motor will likely survive thermally\u2014but only if the housing provides the same thermal path assumed by the supplier's test. If the housing is sealed and compact, you should still apply a 20-30% thermal derating to that continuous line.
Why bus voltage changes the curve
Frameless servo motors are often used with low-voltage DC bus systems such as 24 V or 48 V in robotics, medical devices, and compact automation. A higher bus voltage generally gives more speed margin before voltage limitation becomes dominant. A lower bus voltage may be acceptable for low-speed torque but can run out of speed headroom earlier.
This is why a curve for 48 V should not be blindly applied to a 24 V system.
When comparing curves, check:
- No-load speed at the stated bus voltage.
- Torque available at your target speed.
- Where the curve begins to roll off.
- Whether the current limit or voltage limit is the real boundary.
- Whether the winding option matches your controller.
Kt and current: can the drive deliver the requested torque?
Torque constant, usually written as Kt, links current to torque.
Required phase current = Required torque / KtExample:
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Required peak torque | 3.0 N·m |
| Motor Kt | 0.22 N·m/A |
| Estimated required current | 13.6 A |
| Drive peak current | 12 A |
In this example, the mechanical torque target may be reasonable, but the selected drive cannot deliver enough current margin. The buyer should either choose a different winding, a stronger drive, a lower peak torque requirement, or a larger motor package.
The same check should be done for continuous current. A motor can have enough peak current capacity while still exceeding the drive or thermal continuous current limit.
Thermal assumptions matter more for frameless motors
A housed servo motor may include a known thermal package. A frameless motor depends heavily on the customer's structure. The same stator and rotor can perform differently depending on housing material, contact area, potting method, airflow, duty cycle, and ambient temperature.
For this reason, the torque-speed curve should state the test condition. Examples include:
- Ambient temperature.
- Natural convection or fixed heat sink.
- Winding option.
- Housing contact assumption.
- Continuous temperature limit.
- Peak duration.
If your mechanism has a weak thermal path, derate the curve before committing to the motor.
Simple thermal derating example
Assume a supplier curve shows:
| Condition | Continuous torque |
|---|---|
| 25 °C ambient, strong aluminum housing contact | 1.5 N·m |
| Customer application: sealed compact joint, weak heat path | Unknown |
If the buyer's housing has less contact area, higher ambient temperature, or no airflow, using 1.5 N·m as the production continuous point is risky.
A conservative early screen might derate by 20-35% until better thermal evidence exists:
| Derating assumption | Working continuous torque for early screen |
|---|---|
| 20% derating | 1.2 N·m |
| 30% derating | 1.05 N·m |
| 35% derating | 0.98 N·m |
This is not a replacement for test data. It is a buyer-side risk control before locking a model. If the application needs the full 1.5 N·m continuously, request a thermal test or a housing-specific validation plan.
Duty cycle: the hidden selection variable
Two applications can have the same peak torque and completely different motor requirements.
Example:
| Application | Requirement pattern | Selection risk |
|---|---|---|
| Indexing module | High peak torque for short acceleration, then rest | Peak zone may be acceptable if thermal recovery is enough. |
| Holding axis | Moderate torque for long dwell time | Continuous torque and temperature rise dominate. |
| Robot joint | Repeated acceleration and load variation | RMS torque and thermal model should be checked. |
| Medical positioning axis | Smooth low-speed motion with low heat | Ripple, cogging, and thermal stability become critical. |
This is why the buyer should share motion profile, not only peak torque.
Common mistakes when reading curves
Mistake 1: selecting by stall torque alone
Stall torque may be relevant, but most applications move. The motor must deliver torque at the required speed. We had a medical device customer select a 90mm OD motor based on its 4.0 N\u00b7m stall torque. Their operating speed was 1200 RPM at 24V. At that speed, the voltage roll-off had already cut available torque to 1.8 N\u00b7m. The motor was physically too large for the application it could actually serve.
Mistake 2: ignoring housing heat transfer
If the stator is poorly coupled to the housing, continuous torque will fall\u2014sometimes dramatically. A compact sealed robot joint with set-screw mounting can lose 40-50% of the catalog continuous torque due to the air gap acting as a thermal insulator. We have measured housing surface temperatures of 85\u00b0C on joints where the catalog predicted 55\u00b0C, simply because the stator was not press-fitted.
Mistake 3: treating peak torque as a production duty point
Peak torque is temporary. A customer designing a 6-axis cobot once used the 2-second peak torque value for the shoulder joint's holding torque at full extension. The motor overheated within 90 seconds because the "hold" phase was continuous, not transient. Always ask for allowed peak duration and recovery conditions.
Mistake 4: comparing curves from different voltage classes
A 48V curve and a 24V curve from the same motor look dramatically different above 500 RPM. At 24V, the no-load speed may drop by 40-50% compared to 48V. If your target operating speed is in the upper half of the 48V curve, switching to 24V may make that speed physically unreachable regardless of torque.
Mistake 5: forgetting drive current limits
Even if the motor can theoretically produce the torque, the drive must deliver the current. A common trap: a motor with Kt = 0.15 N\u00b7m/A needs 20A to produce 3.0 N\u00b7m peak. If your servo drive is rated at 15A peak, you will never reach that torque. The curve shows motor capability; you must separately verify controller capability.
Buyer review table for a submitted curve
When a supplier sends a torque-speed curve, review it against these questions.
| Review question | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Is the curve tied to a specific winding option? | Different windings can change speed and current behavior. |
| Is the bus voltage stated? | 24 V and 48 V curves should not be mixed. |
| Is continuous torque separated from peak torque? | Prevents using overload values as production duty points. |
| Is peak duration stated? | Peak torque without time limit is incomplete. |
| Is the thermal condition stated? | Housing and ambient assumptions control continuous output. |
| Is current limit visible or documented? | Confirms whether the controller can reach the curve. |
| Is the curve for the exact stack height? | Stack length changes torque capacity and inertia. |
| Are safety margins documented? | Useful for engineering sign-off and procurement risk review. |
Decision matrix: when to accept, derate, or redesign
Use this decision matrix before moving from curve review to sample purchase.
| Curve review result | Buyer decision | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Required point is inside continuous zone with thermal margin | Accept as a candidate | The motor has first-round margin under the stated condition. |
| Required point is inside continuous zone but close to limit | Derate or request thermal test | Housing, ambient, and duty-cycle assumptions may erase margin. |
| Required point is in peak zone only | Use only for short-duration events | Ask for peak duration and recovery condition. |
| Required speed is near voltage roll-off | Recheck bus voltage and winding | The motor may fail speed target at lower voltage or high load. |
| Required torque exceeds drive current capability | Change winding, drive, or motor size | Motor capability is not useful if the controller cannot supply current. |
| RMS torque exceeds continuous curve | Redesign duty, cooling, or frame size | Repeated heating will dominate even if peak values look acceptable. |
For procurement, this table is also useful because it turns an engineering curve into a buying decision. It makes clear whether the supplier needs to provide a better curve, a larger model, a different winding, or a thermal validation plan.
What to send when requesting a torque-speed curve
To get a useful curve, send a compact test alignment note:
- Target bus voltage.
- Controller current limit.
- Continuous torque-speed point.
- Peak torque-speed point and peak duration.
- Duty cycle or motion sequence.
- Ambient temperature and housing condition.
- Cooling method or sealed enclosure constraints.
For early evaluation, a baseline curve can help narrow options. For final selection, request a project-matched curve or validation plan.
Where Frameless Servo fits in the process
Frameless Servo provides baseline torque-speed resources for first-round sizing and can align project-specific curve requests during RFQ. The goal is to prevent a common failure mode: a motor looks correct in a table, but misses the real duty point after assembly.
Useful next steps:
- Review the Datasheet Library for baseline technical assets.
- Compare product families in Products.
- Send target torque-speed, voltage, and duty-cycle information through Contact / RFQ.
Author

Categories
More Posts

Frameless Servo Motor CAD Files: What Engineers Should Check Before Requesting STEP or IGES
A buyer-side guide to requesting frameless servo motor CAD files, including OD, ID, stack height, datum, cable exit, and revision controls before sample release.


Frameless Motor Magnet Grades: NdFeB SH/UH/EH Guide
Procure frameless servo motor magnet grades with a practical SH, UH, and EH selection framework, thermal margins, evidence requests, and RFQ checks.


How to Address Cogging Torque in Frameless Servo Motors: Slotted vs. Slotless Designs
A comprehensive engineering and procurement guide to evaluating cogging torque in direct-drive frameless servo motors. Compare slotted and slotless designs for precision applications.

